Global warming is a purely political agenda advanced by an elitist think tank called "The Club Of Rome" in order to give the people who control this planet a rationale to tax us for breathing or being alive, whichever way you want to interpret it. This organization's primary reason for being is forced eugenics.
Eugenics, by definition is man's war against himself, with a near term objective of eradicating all "useless eaters" from planet earth. Club of Rome's cover-story is the same green agenda that you've been bombarded with for the last 30 years. They published a book in the 1970's called The Limits Of Growth. More recently, a book called The First Global Revolution spells out how a strategy based around Global Warming "fits the bill" to carry out mass eugenics under the guise of serving our common interest in sustainable living.
That strategy may have once held some water since, in the recent past, the planet did appear to be warming ever so slightly if you didn't take too long-term a view, even though there was never any valid scientific basis to blame that warming on ourselves. There still isn't any basis for believing man is, or ever has been, the cause of global warming. Unless, of course, you think science works by consensus from the masses, and global warming can be proven into existence by polling popular opinion.
"Global Warming" is nothing more or nothing less than a political agenda and it is not caused by CO2 emissions from human activities like living, breathing, eating or even driving. It is caused by the sun, just as global cooling is caused by lack of sun due to cloud, smoke, dust cover or decline in solar output.
CO2 is a minor component in the atmosphere and what humans produce is an even smaller percentage of that. In warmer times - like the Medieval era (900-1300 AD) - the mean temperature on the planet was a degree or two warmer than it is now. Around about the same time, the Vikings were living and farming on the coast of Greenland because Greenland Glaciers had retreated somewhat from the south-western fringe used for agriculture.
That Medieval era warming period wasn't due to cars or from humans breathing too much, nor was it due to dairy cows farting. The sun was going through a warmer period which it does on a fairly predictable cycle just as it goes through cooler periods. Averaging those up and down fluctuations over a period of say 10,000 years, since the last ice-age, indicates that the mean earth temperature is actually on a slight decline.
Right now the sun is in one of its cooler periods, with sun-spot activity considerably down from what we've become used to. Accordingly, global mean temperatures are down slightly from the short-term highs which were reached around 1998-9. Sun spot activity varies up and down in 11 or 12 year cycles and presently we're into a down trend as is mean global temperature.
"What about melting polar ice and the poor polar bears?" I hear you ask.
Again, there is no connection between human activity and ocean temperature changes despite all the scare-mongering. In short, ocean temperature, like air temperature is based on the natural cycles of sun, weather and earth geology. Earth geology is part of the mix because there is a strong relationship between ocean warming and underwater volcanic activity. As any boy scout knows, you can easily boil water by tossing red hot rocks into it.
This cycle of volcanic increase by the way, if it continues, and I'm not saying it will, has been in the past, a precursor to climate and temperature collapse on the earth.
Increased underwater volcanism helps drive water vapour and volcanic smoke and dust into the atmosphere. That exacerbates cloud cover and dimming, which in turn, promotes cooling. Eventually percipitation in the form of snow falling on the colder parts of the planet never fully melts. Since snow cover reflects sunlight, that promotes even further cooling and a downward spiral ensues.
The more recent term "Climate Change" has come into general use to replace "Global Warming" because the earth's mean temperature is dropping ever so slightly, not increasing as we're being repeatedly told. The political agenda continues unabated, and is apparently gaining steam through "science by consensus".
Rest assured, however, that man's presence on this planet has little or no influence on global heating, cooling or climate change. If man has had an impact it certainly isn't caused by our CO2 production. Smog, pollution, and poisons in the air and in our food are entirely another matter. They are alternate manifestations of the eugenics agenda that infects our common reality and while they should cause us concern, they don't cause global warming.
Now here is a bit of research material you may want to explore. Watch the videos, even if you feel you're scientifically challenged. It's enlightening and refreshing to hear someone cut through the political agenda and speak some sense.
Here is another opinion that agrees with the above:
Other References:
Alan Watt
Robert Felix
Ian Plimer
Cheers...
Gus Creces
gcreces@sympatico.ca
Saturday, September 12, 2009
Thursday, September 10, 2009
Fluoride Anyone???
Hi All... [Originally An Email]
Got Fluoride in your water, your tea, coffee?
Using Fluoride toothpaste?
Using Prozac?
Your dentist giving you this stuff after cleaning your teeth?
Listen to this brief audio report about Fluoride and fluoridation from Alex Jones: http://www.cwhandy.com/flouride.mp3
Why is this stuff legal if it's really so bad for us? There is a clear, well documented explanation for this and many things going on in our lives today, but if I told you the details outright, you wouldn't believe me. So here is the first of a number of brief snapshots to help you get a clearer picture. Take it or leave it, and please don't shoot the messenger.
Forward this on to anyone who might be interested, or don't - your call. If you don't, you won't be smitten from on high, if you do, you won't get $15,000 from Bill Gates nor a guarantee that you'll go to heaven when you die.
If you're vacillating, then before you forget all about this message, take a look at a few of the following:
http://www.fluoridealert.org/health/cancer/osteosarcoma.html
http://www.webmd.com/cancer/news/20060406/does-fluoridation-up-bone-cancer-risk
http://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS145903+29-Apr-2009+PRN20090429
http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G1-191350795.html
Or just google Fluoride and you'll get a list as long as your arm.
An upcoming report will be about another really nasty little chemical we all encounter daily, called Bisphenol-A. After that, a report about swine flu vaccine and vaccines in general.
To discontinue receiving these depressing messages reply to this email and tell me you don't give a shit if your children and grandchildren are being poisoned and dumbed down, by everyday chemicals in their food and ordinary, take-for-granted-stuff they encounter in their daily lives.
Cheers...
Gus
gcreces@sympatico.ca
Got Fluoride in your water, your tea, coffee?
Using Fluoride toothpaste?
Using Prozac?
Your dentist giving you this stuff after cleaning your teeth?
Listen to this brief audio report about Fluoride and fluoridation from Alex Jones: http://www.cwhandy.com/flouride.mp3
Why is this stuff legal if it's really so bad for us? There is a clear, well documented explanation for this and many things going on in our lives today, but if I told you the details outright, you wouldn't believe me. So here is the first of a number of brief snapshots to help you get a clearer picture. Take it or leave it, and please don't shoot the messenger.
Forward this on to anyone who might be interested, or don't - your call. If you don't, you won't be smitten from on high, if you do, you won't get $15,000 from Bill Gates nor a guarantee that you'll go to heaven when you die.
If you're vacillating, then before you forget all about this message, take a look at a few of the following:
http://www.fluoridealert.org/health/cancer/osteosarcoma.html
http://www.webmd.com/cancer/news/20060406/does-fluoridation-up-bone-cancer-risk
http://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS145903+29-Apr-2009+PRN20090429
http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G1-191350795.html
Or just google Fluoride and you'll get a list as long as your arm.
An upcoming report will be about another really nasty little chemical we all encounter daily, called Bisphenol-A. After that, a report about swine flu vaccine and vaccines in general.
To discontinue receiving these depressing messages reply to this email and tell me you don't give a shit if your children and grandchildren are being poisoned and dumbed down, by everyday chemicals in their food and ordinary, take-for-granted-stuff they encounter in their daily lives.
Cheers...
Gus
gcreces@sympatico.ca
Tuesday, May 26, 2009
No Evidence Of Global Warming - Dutch Scientist Says
24 May 09 - Analytical chemist Hans Schreuder recently spoke to the Northern Ireland Climate Change Committee.
“Your Committee (should) think twice about climate change mitigation measures,” said Schreuder, pointing out that they have been subjected to “a bandwagon process by which countries around the world are pressured to make widespread and costly commitments without an absolute or even a vague assurance that the phenomenon exists.”
“The UN's IPCC bases its dire forecasts on nothing more than computer models that regard the earth as a flat disk bathed in a constant 24 hour haze of sunlight, without north and south poles, without clouds and without any relationship to the real planet we live on.
“Despite much rhetoric and research over the past two decades, there is still not a single piece of actual evidence that the now-maligned carbon dioxide molecule causes global warming (or "climate change").
“To over 40,000 fellow scientists from around the world and to myself this is no surprise, for no such evidence can ever be found. (italics added)
“Carbon dioxide, at less than 400 parts per million by volume, does not and can not influence either the atmospheric temperature or the climate in a measurable way. Only laboratory experiments with heat lamps can make carbon dioxide do what climate change proponents want it to do, that is, warm the flasks that contain CO2. Yet this is not principally how the open atmosphere gets heated and no laboratory experiment can mimic actual air dynamics or be extrapolated to represent them.
"Any and all evidence that has ever been presented to support the idea that carbon dioxide has an effect on global temperatures has been biased, opinionated and based on an agenda that pre-emptively dismissed alternative explanations."
"Computer simulations regard the earth as a flat disk, without North or South Pole, without the Tropics, without clouds and bathed in a 24 hour haze of sunshine. The reality is two icy poles and a tropical equatorial zone, with each and every square metre of our earth receiving an ever varying and different amount of energy from the sun, season to season and day to day. This reality is too difficult to input to a computer.
Did you realise that?"
"If carbon dioxide really is such a danger to mankind, as the US Environmental Protection Agency would have us believe, then the upcoming Olympic Games should be cancelled, as well as all other big sporting events, as well as all road transport and all air transport and all coal- and gas-fired powerstations should be shut down. Clearly there is no need for such drastic action and clearly carbon dioxide is not dangerous at all."
"The above makes a mockery of saying that today’s level is unprecedented."
"As a further rebuttal of the influence of carbon dioxide over the climate, the alleged IPCC greenhouse effect is a non-existent effect. No greenhouse, whether made from glass, plastic, cardboard or steel will reach a higher inside temperature due to the magic of re-radiated infrared energy. If it did, engineers would have long ago been able to design power stations made from air, mirrors and glass, extracting more energy out of it than was put into it - if only!"
"The periodicity in the data and the unequivocal solar linkage were not even addressed. This is not science. The whole climate change issue is about to fall apart. Heads will roll.”
"Any and all schemes to reduce carbon dioxide emissions are futile in terms of having an effect on global temperatures or the climate and any and all carbon trading exchanges are a fraudulent exercise amounting to no more than hidden taxation.
Here's a link to the speech itself:
http://www.tech-know.eu/NISubmission/pdf/NI_oral_evidence.pdf
And here's the entire paper that Schreuder submitted to the
Northern Ireland Climate Change Committee:
http://www.tech-know.eu/NISubmission/index.html
“Your Committee (should) think twice about climate change mitigation measures,” said Schreuder, pointing out that they have been subjected to “a bandwagon process by which countries around the world are pressured to make widespread and costly commitments without an absolute or even a vague assurance that the phenomenon exists.”
“The UN's IPCC bases its dire forecasts on nothing more than computer models that regard the earth as a flat disk bathed in a constant 24 hour haze of sunlight, without north and south poles, without clouds and without any relationship to the real planet we live on.
“Despite much rhetoric and research over the past two decades, there is still not a single piece of actual evidence that the now-maligned carbon dioxide molecule causes global warming (or "climate change").
“To over 40,000 fellow scientists from around the world and to myself this is no surprise, for no such evidence can ever be found. (italics added)
“Carbon dioxide, at less than 400 parts per million by volume, does not and can not influence either the atmospheric temperature or the climate in a measurable way. Only laboratory experiments with heat lamps can make carbon dioxide do what climate change proponents want it to do, that is, warm the flasks that contain CO2. Yet this is not principally how the open atmosphere gets heated and no laboratory experiment can mimic actual air dynamics or be extrapolated to represent them.
"Any and all evidence that has ever been presented to support the idea that carbon dioxide has an effect on global temperatures has been biased, opinionated and based on an agenda that pre-emptively dismissed alternative explanations."
"Computer simulations regard the earth as a flat disk, without North or South Pole, without the Tropics, without clouds and bathed in a 24 hour haze of sunshine. The reality is two icy poles and a tropical equatorial zone, with each and every square metre of our earth receiving an ever varying and different amount of energy from the sun, season to season and day to day. This reality is too difficult to input to a computer.
Did you realise that?"
"If carbon dioxide really is such a danger to mankind, as the US Environmental Protection Agency would have us believe, then the upcoming Olympic Games should be cancelled, as well as all other big sporting events, as well as all road transport and all air transport and all coal- and gas-fired powerstations should be shut down. Clearly there is no need for such drastic action and clearly carbon dioxide is not dangerous at all."
"The above makes a mockery of saying that today’s level is unprecedented."
"As a further rebuttal of the influence of carbon dioxide over the climate, the alleged IPCC greenhouse effect is a non-existent effect. No greenhouse, whether made from glass, plastic, cardboard or steel will reach a higher inside temperature due to the magic of re-radiated infrared energy. If it did, engineers would have long ago been able to design power stations made from air, mirrors and glass, extracting more energy out of it than was put into it - if only!"
"The periodicity in the data and the unequivocal solar linkage were not even addressed. This is not science. The whole climate change issue is about to fall apart. Heads will roll.”
"Any and all schemes to reduce carbon dioxide emissions are futile in terms of having an effect on global temperatures or the climate and any and all carbon trading exchanges are a fraudulent exercise amounting to no more than hidden taxation.
Here's a link to the speech itself:
http://www.tech-know.eu/NISubmission/pdf/NI_oral_evidence.pdf
And here's the entire paper that Schreuder submitted to the
Northern Ireland Climate Change Committee:
http://www.tech-know.eu/NISubmission/index.html
Monday, May 25, 2009
Population Control By Plastic Hardener
All hard plastic bottles contain Bisphenol A. This chemical is implicated in a 75 percent reduction of male fertility over the last 50 years. Male fertility loss is only one of it numerous, detrimental side effects. Worse news still, Bisphenol A can also be found in the plastic linings of food cans, beer cans, pop cans, juice cans, and paper coffee cups. In other words its everywhere in the food chain of western societies.
At the end of this blog are references from which the core information I'm giving you is sourced. Follow them for more detailed information.
The dangers of Bisphenol A are real and to a great extent proven by reputable scientific sources. They include as mentioned above, male fertility loss, but BPA is also heavily implicated in breast cancer and early-onset puberty in 8-9 year old girls due.
• Bisphenol A is is officially classified as toxic in some countries.
• The study found that participants who drank for a week from polycarbonate bottles (hard plastic bottles) showed a 69 per cent increase in their urine of BPA.
• Previous studies have suggested that high levels of BPA consumption are linked to birth defects, growth problems and an increased risk of heart disease and diabetes.
• Heating hard plastic bottles with baby formula, or re-heating paper coffee cups, (yes paper coffee cups have BPA-impregnated plastic liners) causes the chemical to leak in potentially dangerous quantities into the liquid contained within
• In Canada - as of last year - BPA has been outlawed in baby bottles. Beware baby bottles manufactured anywhere else. Since that includes all or most of them, use glass or stainless steel bottles.
• Harvard medical school findings: "We found that drinking cold liquids from polycarbonate bottles for just one week increased urinary BPA levels by more than two-thirds."
• Harvard again: "While previous studies have demonstrated that BPA is linked to adverse health effects, this study fills in a missing piece of the puzzle -whether or not polycarbonate plastic bottles are an important contributor to the amount of BPA in the body."
The Harvard study is a NEW study, clearly from a reliable source, which it puts a lie to much of the plastic industry's self-interested disinformation. Remember the cigarette manufacturers produced a lot of evidence in the 60's that cigarettes were not the cause of health problems and lung cancer. They were even caught paying off researchers and medical experts to provide bogus evidence to support their claims.
The dangers of Bisphenol A have been known since the 1930's, yet of all the possible ways to produce hardened plastic, the Western world chose Bisphenol A. In future blogs I will explore why this may be happening, despite clear evidence that Bisphenol A is extremely dangerous to human health.
• "Experiments with rats demonstrate that low level exposure to bisphenol A during fetal growth causes breast cancer in adults. At all levels tested down to 2.5 parts per billion, BPA induced formation of aberrant cell growth patterns associated in rodents and people with breast cancer. Levels only 5 times higher than EPA's current safe level caused carcinoma in situ. Using these results to set safety standards would radically reduce use of BPA in plastics and resins."
• "Perinatal exposure to extremely low levels of bisphenol A causes precancerous prostate lesions in rats. These lesions, called prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, or PIN, are cancerous and are considered to be a precursor of metastatic prostate cancer in humans. One hundred percent of rats exposed perinatally and then, during adulthood, treated with estradiol and testosterone to create hormonal conditions analogous to thos of an ageing man, developed high-grade PIN. The effect appears to result from the failure in exposed animals of a gene to become hypermethylated as the rats aged."
• Male sperm density between 1939 and 1990 in the western world went gone down an average of 1.5 million sperm per millilitre or about 1.5 percent per year. (In Europe 3.1 percent per year.)
If you do the math here's the conclusion: 50 years times 1.5 percent per year equals a 75 percent reduction in sperm count over the period. This study is 19 years old so the amount of reduction is likely higher than that, particularly in Europe.
BPA has in all likelihood been a big contributor to this statistic. Less daily use of BPA-containing materials, particularly hard plastic water and soft drink bottles, may help to explain why birth rates in 3rd world countries have not fallen off as precipitously as they have in the Western world, despite the billions spent by the UN and groups like the Bill and Linda Gates foundation to promote birth control in 3rd world nations.
Some easy remedies to reduce BPA exposure:
• Drink water from the tap - unless your town has fluoridated water because flourides are a whole different group of chemicals which need to be avoided.
• I think milk from soft plastic bags is OK. At least I haven't found any evidence it isn't OK. Avoid hard plastic returnable milk jugs.
•Make coffee at home from tap water or bring a ceramic mug to Tim Horton's.
• If you drink pop, beer, wine, juice, buy it in glass containers only.
• Wash fruit and vegetables well before eating or cooking. (Fungicides sprayed on these contain BPA).
• If your house has plastic plumbing on the water input side, replace it with copper. PVC (Polyvinyl Chloride) piping uses BPA as a hardener and stabilizer. PVC is fine for drains and waste water plumbing. Note that BPA can be absorbed into the body in a shower so even if you're not drinking the water, all input water should be through copper.
• No plastics of any kind in the microwave oven. Glass and ceramics only.
References:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1186128/Gender-bending-fear-plastic-drinks-bottles.html
http://www.ourstolenfuture.org/NewScience/oncompounds/bisphenola/bpauses.htm
http://www.environmentalhealthnews.org/archives.jsp?sm=&tn=0text&tv=bisphenol&ss=1
http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/abstract/41/12/1896/
Gus M. Creces - News From The Matrix
At the end of this blog are references from which the core information I'm giving you is sourced. Follow them for more detailed information.
The dangers of Bisphenol A are real and to a great extent proven by reputable scientific sources. They include as mentioned above, male fertility loss, but BPA is also heavily implicated in breast cancer and early-onset puberty in 8-9 year old girls due.
• Bisphenol A is is officially classified as toxic in some countries.
• The study found that participants who drank for a week from polycarbonate bottles (hard plastic bottles) showed a 69 per cent increase in their urine of BPA.
• Previous studies have suggested that high levels of BPA consumption are linked to birth defects, growth problems and an increased risk of heart disease and diabetes.
• Heating hard plastic bottles with baby formula, or re-heating paper coffee cups, (yes paper coffee cups have BPA-impregnated plastic liners) causes the chemical to leak in potentially dangerous quantities into the liquid contained within
• In Canada - as of last year - BPA has been outlawed in baby bottles. Beware baby bottles manufactured anywhere else. Since that includes all or most of them, use glass or stainless steel bottles.
• Harvard medical school findings: "We found that drinking cold liquids from polycarbonate bottles for just one week increased urinary BPA levels by more than two-thirds."
• Harvard again: "While previous studies have demonstrated that BPA is linked to adverse health effects, this study fills in a missing piece of the puzzle -whether or not polycarbonate plastic bottles are an important contributor to the amount of BPA in the body."
The Harvard study is a NEW study, clearly from a reliable source, which it puts a lie to much of the plastic industry's self-interested disinformation. Remember the cigarette manufacturers produced a lot of evidence in the 60's that cigarettes were not the cause of health problems and lung cancer. They were even caught paying off researchers and medical experts to provide bogus evidence to support their claims.
The dangers of Bisphenol A have been known since the 1930's, yet of all the possible ways to produce hardened plastic, the Western world chose Bisphenol A. In future blogs I will explore why this may be happening, despite clear evidence that Bisphenol A is extremely dangerous to human health.
• "Experiments with rats demonstrate that low level exposure to bisphenol A during fetal growth causes breast cancer in adults. At all levels tested down to 2.5 parts per billion, BPA induced formation of aberrant cell growth patterns associated in rodents and people with breast cancer. Levels only 5 times higher than EPA's current safe level caused carcinoma in situ. Using these results to set safety standards would radically reduce use of BPA in plastics and resins."
• "Perinatal exposure to extremely low levels of bisphenol A causes precancerous prostate lesions in rats. These lesions, called prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, or PIN, are cancerous and are considered to be a precursor of metastatic prostate cancer in humans. One hundred percent of rats exposed perinatally and then, during adulthood, treated with estradiol and testosterone to create hormonal conditions analogous to thos of an ageing man, developed high-grade PIN. The effect appears to result from the failure in exposed animals of a gene to become hypermethylated as the rats aged."
Male Sperm Count Down 75 Percent in 50 Years
• Male sperm density between 1939 and 1990 in the western world went gone down an average of 1.5 million sperm per millilitre or about 1.5 percent per year. (In Europe 3.1 percent per year.)
If you do the math here's the conclusion: 50 years times 1.5 percent per year equals a 75 percent reduction in sperm count over the period. This study is 19 years old so the amount of reduction is likely higher than that, particularly in Europe.
BPA has in all likelihood been a big contributor to this statistic. Less daily use of BPA-containing materials, particularly hard plastic water and soft drink bottles, may help to explain why birth rates in 3rd world countries have not fallen off as precipitously as they have in the Western world, despite the billions spent by the UN and groups like the Bill and Linda Gates foundation to promote birth control in 3rd world nations.
Some easy remedies to reduce BPA exposure:
• Drink water from the tap - unless your town has fluoridated water because flourides are a whole different group of chemicals which need to be avoided.
• I think milk from soft plastic bags is OK. At least I haven't found any evidence it isn't OK. Avoid hard plastic returnable milk jugs.
•Make coffee at home from tap water or bring a ceramic mug to Tim Horton's.
• If you drink pop, beer, wine, juice, buy it in glass containers only.
• Wash fruit and vegetables well before eating or cooking. (Fungicides sprayed on these contain BPA).
• If your house has plastic plumbing on the water input side, replace it with copper. PVC (Polyvinyl Chloride) piping uses BPA as a hardener and stabilizer. PVC is fine for drains and waste water plumbing. Note that BPA can be absorbed into the body in a shower so even if you're not drinking the water, all input water should be through copper.
• No plastics of any kind in the microwave oven. Glass and ceramics only.
References:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1186128/Gender-bending-fear-plastic-drinks-bottles.html
http://www.ourstolenfuture.org/NewScience/oncompounds/bisphenola/bpauses.htm
http://www.environmentalhealthnews.org/archives.jsp?sm=&tn=0text&tv=bisphenol&ss=1
http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/abstract/41/12/1896/
Gus M. Creces - News From The Matrix
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)